A Message from the President
Gonzaga University President Thayne McCulloh issued the following statement today regarding the student conduct case being shared in the media.
During the past forty-eight hours, there has been a significant amount of communication regarding a recent neighborhood incident involving two of our students, the institution’s policies as regards possession of firearms in campus housing, and concerns about the University’s response to this incident under its Code of Conduct. I believe it is in the best interests of our Community to utilize this set of circumstances to address several of the key issues that have arisen.
First, the University takes seriously its responsibilities under its own policies and the Family Educational Rights and Protection Act (FERPA) to preserve the privacy and confidentiality of our students. This protection includes their right to privacy as regards disciplinary proceedings and outcomes. While the specific outcome of the disciplinary hearing that took place yesterday is confidential, it is my understanding that the outcome itself was communicated to the students yesterday afternoon.
A primary obligation of Gonzaga University is to work to ensure the safety and security of its students, faculty, staff and local community. To this end, Gonzaga hires its own Campus Security and Public Safety officers, who work in close concert with the Spokane Police Department. It also employs a number of individuals, including students (e.g., Residence Hall Staff) who are designated as responsible for working with students and staff to ensure compliance with University Policies — all of which are published, readily available, and exist to protect the health, safety, and welfare of everyone at the University.
Many of the policies promulgated by Gonzaga University exist either as a function of (a) our Mission as a Jesuit, Catholic university, (b) federal, state, or local regulations, or (c) the need to create framework in response to actual incidents which have occurred at the institution over time. Gonzaga is very similar to many other schools, colleges and universities around the country which prohibit students’ possession of firearms in campus housing facilities; the overarching objective of these is to minimize the potential for intentional or unintentional harm.
In light of the specific circumstances reported in the Gonzaga Bulletin and the press, there have been calls for a re-examination of the University’s policies relating to firearms. As a Jesuit institution dedicated to the thoughtful evaluation of complex social issues, I believe this to be an opportunity to do some important work, as a community: to objectively re-examine our firearms policy and openly debate perspectives and contextual issues with an eye towards an honest and open review of the same. Therefore, I have asked our Vice President for Student Development, Dr. Biggs Garbuio, to work in conjunction with GSBA and RHA to facilitate a campus dialogue focused on this issue. In the meantime, the Student Handbook and its Code of Conduct are in effect and all students are obligated to know their rights and acknowledge their responsibilities as established within them.
Finally, I do wish to make a point which I believe to be both relevant and important at this time. Gonzaga University is itself part and parcel of a larger community — which includes the Logan Neighborhood, Mission Park, the University District and Downtown. A significant number of Gonzaga students live side-by-side with families and long-time residents of these areas. Just as students have a right to feel safe and secure in their residences, so too do the non-student members of the community — a point which obligates us all to recognize that everything we do affects others. The families and long-time members of the Logan Neighborhood and Gonzaga University are important partners in the shared goal of working towards a safe living environment for all — one we will continue to work hard at creating, every day.
Jim Lakey
It is absolutely correct to review your policies concerning this incident. I believe that your present policy is wrong.
These students protected themselves properly. Now that it has become widely known that students in your apartments
do not possess weapons (to defend themselves), those that prey on students (unarmed and unable to defend themselves)
may see this as an opportunity for criminal activity. Please take a long hard look at your policy to allow self defense.
Diane Kerr
Although this indecent is tragic, it would only be compounded if those two students were expelled from school. I value your beliefs and traditions, but had it not been for this student’s weapon they probably would be dead. Perhaps they were targeted since the perpetrator knew that they were not permitted to have a weapon.
Since one did break the school code, some light reprimand or punishment may be in order, but expulsion would be extreme. Also, since he had a concealed weapons permit, I do not think having a weapon is wrong. Actually, he did everything right!